readme: tighten cost claim and agent copy by abrahamwolke · Pull Request #144 · supermodeltools/cli

abrahamwolke · 2026-04-24T18:03:06Z

Summary

"Save up to 40%" → "Save 40%+" — more direct and confident; "up to" undersells the claim
"normal file-reading tools" → "native search & file reading tools" — more precise about the mechanism (search + read, not just read)

No code changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Documentation
- Revised top-line performance claim to "Cut agent token costs by ~40% in benchmarks."
- Clarified wording to state agents use native search and file-reading tools.
- Text-only update to the README; no behavioral or configuration changes documented.

coderabbitai · 2026-04-24T18:03:19Z

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@greynewell has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 56 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review.

To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b428cf2d-a349-4613-aa69-baab26d4f263

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c2d2a1 and 7b1d898.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

README.md

Walkthrough

The README text is updated: the top-line performance claim now reads "Cut agent token costs by ~40% in benchmarks," and the .graph agent-consumption phrasing is changed to "native search & file reading tools." No behavioral or API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
README Documentation `README.md`	Reworded top-level performance claim to "Cut agent token costs by ~40% in benchmarks" and changed `.graph` consumption wording from "normal file-reading tools" to "native search & file reading tools". Only textual edits; no code or API surface changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

[codex] Refine README graph messaging #145: Overlapping README messaging edits—similar token-savings phrasing and .graph agent/file-reading wording.
Rewrite README: outcome-led headline, how it works, works with any agent #57: Related README wording around agent compatibility and how .graph files are consumed by agents.

Suggested reviewers

jonathanpopham
greynewell

Poem

Tiny edits, clearer claims, a README reborn,
Agents read native, tokens cut — not torn.
Words sharpened, benchmarks hum along,
A small doc tweak, but it feels so strong. 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description explains the changes but omits the required template sections (What, Why, Test plan) and lacks issue links or testing verification.	Add proper template structure with 'What' and 'Why' sections, link related issues if any, and include test plan checklist completion or explanation.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'readme: tighten cost claim and agent copy' directly summarizes the main changes: refining README wording around cost claims and agent descriptions.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests
Commit unit tests in branch readme/copy-updates

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

_{Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 56 minutes and 11 seconds.}

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 3: The headline "Save 40%+ on agent token costs with code graphs." is an
over‑general claim; update that copy (the exact string "Save 40%+ on agent token
costs with code graphs.") to qualify the savings—e.g., append "in our
benchmarks," "in tested scenarios," or "up to 40%+ in benchmarked workloads"
and/or add a parenthetical or footnote linking to the benchmark methodology so
readers don’t treat it as a universal guarantee.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9384e4e7-9b7c-4c5a-ab58-b174aeef107d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2c910a and 9c5932e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

README.md

- "up to 40%" → "40%+" (more direct) - "normal file-reading tools" → "native search & file reading tools" (more precise)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

abrahamwolke requested review from greynewell and jonathanpopham as code owners April 24, 2026 18:03

coderabbitai Bot reviewed Apr 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread README.md

abrahamwolke and others added 3 commits April 30, 2026 10:07

readme: tighten cost claim and agent integration copy

7275dac

- "up to 40%" → "40%+" (more direct) - "normal file-reading tools" → "native search & file reading tools" (more precise)

readme: qualify cost claim with benchmark context

a025655

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

revert: restore original headline copy

7b1d898

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

greynewell force-pushed the readme/copy-updates branch from 527b4e0 to 7b1d898 Compare April 30, 2026 14:08

greynewell merged commit 928b4a9 into main Apr 30, 2026
7 checks passed

greynewell deleted the readme/copy-updates branch April 30, 2026 14:11

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

readme: tighten cost claim and agent copy#144

readme: tighten cost claim and agent copy#144
greynewell merged 3 commits intomainfrom
readme/copy-updates

abrahamwolke commented Apr 24, 2026 •

edited by coderabbitai Bot

Loading

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Rate limit exceeded

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

abrahamwolke commented Apr 24, 2026 • edited by coderabbitai Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Rate limit exceeded

Walkthrough

Changes

Estimated code review effort

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

Poem

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

abrahamwolke commented Apr 24, 2026 •

edited by coderabbitai Bot

Loading

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading